Technical Details of Open RAN

Learn about Open RAN, how it differs from traditional RAN, and examine the high-level technical details that will enable it to function moving forward.

By Jeremy Cook 

Throughout the world, more data is being distributed wirelessly. Cellular networks have transformed over the last 20 years to support various degrees of network size, complexity, throughput, and security. With the era of 5G right on our doorstep, these networks are becoming increasingly vast and complex. 

This expansion has created a growing need for rigorous performance upgrades, network management optimization, cost reduction, and marketplace competition. This article introduces Open RAN and examines the high-level technical details that will enable it to function down the line.

What is Open RAN?

Open RAN (Radio Access Network) is a fundamental movement towards a modern wireless network architecture that utilizes open hardware, software, and the interfaces of wireless cellular networks. Open RAN's primary purpose is to enable aggressive network innovation, better network services, and foster a multi-vendor environment. With traditional RAN infrastructure, participation in the marketplace requires a full-stack network aggregation of the proprietary hardware, software, and interfaces required to run a cellular network, all of which demand high development and management costs. 

What is Open RAN Disaggregation?

Open RAN aims to disaggregate ownership of a full-stack network. This means enabling the interoperability of all network components, such as hardware, software, interfaces, network security, automation, and more. Ultimately, Open RAN aims to provide greater flexibility and agility for service providers to deploy a network.

A typical, traditional RAN requires that service providers architect their service utilizing proprietary hardware, effectively locking the provider into only using devices available from that hardware manufacturer. While this may be an astute business strategy for the hardware vendor, it shackles innovation and creates silos in which network technology exists.

Types of RAN: Traditional RAN vs. Open RAN

Let's consider an example. Say Company A, a service provider, relies on Company B to provide them with the EPC Core of their network. They're restricted to utilizing whatever proprietary interface is compatible with that EPC Core. Subsequently, the Central Units (CUs) of the network must be compatible with the Core's interface. 

Even further down the communication chain, the network's Base Band Units (BBUs) must also interface with the same CUs. Lastly, the Radio Units (RUs) that sit on the cellular towers, of course, must interface with the network's BBUs. Due to the propriety nature of each component in the network's "stack," whether it be the hardware, software, or interfaces, Company A is essentially committed to relying on the entire stack from a single vendor. This reality is referred to as Vendor Lock-In. 

The goal of Open RAN architecture is to reduce vendor lock-in and spur innovation in various areas within the network. One implementation of Open RAN architecture is vRAN (virtual RAN), which functionally mimics traditional RANs. But there are fundamental differences: vRAN utilizes Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) Distribution Units (DU) to function as a software-driven VDU (Virtual Distribute Unit), which is the functional alternative to a traditional BBU. These VDUs utilize VNF (Virtual Network Function) to emulate traditional BBUs that use software alone. 

Subsequently, the VDU interfaces with a COTS Virtual Core Unit (VCU), an alternative to the traditional CU. Both the VDU and VCU are software-driven, and, most importantly, not limited to a single manufacturer. Therefore, the interface and hardware aren't "locked" into a specific manufacturer. Instead, the software that manages the vRAN in this example functions as the traditional BBU and CU, allowing Company A to be much more flexible and agile with its network management.

Conclusion

There are many facets to Open RAN architecture fundamentals. The RU-to-Core hardware example highlighted in this article is only a tiny technical facet of the more significant industry push towards network disaggregation. Open RAN fundamentals are already being implemented to accelerate the pace of 5G network deployments, and they'll allow future generations of networks to evolve more quickly and efficiently than ever before.

 

最新消息

Sorry, your filter selection returned no results.

请仔细阅读我们近期更改的隐私政策。当按下确认键时,您已了解并同意艾睿电子的隐私政策和用户协议。

本网站需使用cookies以改善用户您的体验并进一步改进我们的网站。此处阅读了解关于网站cookies的使用以及如何禁用cookies。网页cookies和追踪功能或許用于市场分析。当您按下同意按钮,您已经了解并同意在您的设备上接受cookies,并给予网站追踪权限。更多关于如何取消网站cookies及追踪的信息,请点击下方“阅读更多”。尽管同意启用cookies追踪与否取决用户意愿,取消网页cookies及追踪可能导致网站运作或显示异常,亦或导致相关推荐广告减少。

我们尊重您的隐私。请在此阅读我们的隐私政策。